Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill. Do you agree or disagree?
There is a fair amount of people believes that much time is devoted to teaching the facts instead of focusing on hands-on experience in all phases of learning, whether it is school or college. From my sentiment, I totally accord on it and in this essay, I will support my view with valid argument and examples. Facilities
First and foremost, most of the institutes follow the conventional method of teaching which includes reading and writing. By this method, students can only recall concepts for a limited amount of time and when it is time to apply that knowledge at work they have forgotten it. Consequently, many students who have a degree in physics or electronics cannot even change bulbs would be an example worth mentioning. Likewise, many MBAs cannot fill out a tax form. All these points to the shortcomings of a system of learning that focuses only on theory.
Admittedly, it could be said that the current curriculum does not have an equal number of theory and practical classes. To prove my point, while I had one lecture each day on object-oriented programming, there was only one practice session for the whole week. Due to this improper organization, I could not practice everything being taught and hence lacked a proper understanding of the concepts. If we had an equal proportion of theory and laboratory classes, I would have gained better skills and more confidence to enter the labor market.
After discussing all the points and examples above, I can finally conclude that much time spent on theory rather of experimental learning due to the current structure of leaning. Unfortunately, this overemphasis on theory makes barriers to student from acquiring real world skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... valid argument and examples. Facilities First and foremost, most of the institut...
^^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e confidence to enter the labor market. After discussing all the points and exam...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, hence, if, likewise, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02120141343 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86318527417 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621908127208 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8534162336 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.307692308 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150925712833 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477837383619 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535742330275 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922722709762 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411267163698 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.