some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of spots facilities. Other, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Enhancing public health is a major topic of concern in modern society. While some people believe that the most viable measure is an increase in the number of sports centre, some are of the opinion that there should be other solutions to tackle the problem.
Advocates have several reasons to believe that fitness facilities play a vital role in general public's wellness. Admitedly, the clear benefit of these facilities is to boost the health of individuals. It is widely accepted that regular exercises can help prevent numerous, especially heart-related diseases. Most health problems that lead to death result from non-communicable diseases which can be avoided by body training. Thus, easy-to-access gym or sport centres may result in better public wellbeing.
However, though catering for a wide range of fitness requirements, increasing the number of sport facilities is just a contributing factor. This may because not many people find their time spending for fitness purposes. In addition, the hectic work schedule and a sedentary lifestyle make less-motivated individuals feel reluctant to stretch their body. In this case, additional construction of local sport centers seem to be less efficient.
Thereby, I believe that other interventions should be taken around the benefits of public sports facilities, and the most feasible way is educating people about a healthier lifestyle. This could be done by running campaigns, educating children, and putting higher tax on junk foods, to name but a few. Altering public attitudes to an appropriate way of living can, in a way, foster the general public's wellbeing because to combat a social concern, a joined effort between the gorvernment and its people need to be made.
To conclude, although it is often believe that more sports facilities lead to better public health, I firmly believe that a combination of different measures is essential to tackle the root of the problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...facilities play a vital role in general publics wellness. Admitedly, the clear benefit ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 395, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...iving can, in a way, foster the general publics wellbeing because to combat a social co...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34201954397 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92311839704 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602605863192 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6939919999 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224907777699 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694555053613 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495465464755 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126744545132 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561587931732 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.