Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
there has been a constant debate whether students should be allowed to choose their own subjects to study or rather listen to advice from their parents is better. In my view, I partly agree with the first idea.
there are many reasons why letting students study their favourite subjects would bring more benefits, especially in the long-run. Firstly, for students, they will be more creative since they are not obligated to follow a strict formula applied to everyone else. Moreover, with the current emphasis on creativity in several particular services industries, for example, designing, clothing, this would be their competitive advantages for any individual willing to take risks. Another reason is that students also have a tendency of putting more efforts into studying their favourite course; as a result, it helps to boost the success of their academic learning process.
On the other hand, we cannot but also have to mention the positive outcomes if more and more students graduate with the skills and skills of subjects demanded by the current industry. The first benefit is that it will reduce the shortage of talented workers in some particular demanding sector: engineering, manufacturing or even astronomy. In these sectors, the lack of competent workers has been an on-going problem which undermines the productivity of their operation. Last but not least, it is more likely that these students would be able to get immediate high-paying jobs thus have better career progression after their studying. this result from the fact that these graduates, under the early orientation from their schools and families, have time to acquire such amount of knowledge compared to people who have not yet to understand what they should follow.
In conclusion, allowing young people to choose subjects based on their needs, in my opinion, is outweigh the benefits of telling these youngsters what to do. However, in any practice, students should fully understand themselves and receive consultant from people they know.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
there has been a constant debate whether stud...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... partly agree with the first idea. there are many reasons why letting students s...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 402, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...e lack of competent workers has been an on-going problem which undermines the productivi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 637, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...areer progression after their studying. this result from the fact that these graduat...
^^^^
Line 13, column 97, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...based on their needs, in my opinion, is outweigh the benefits of telling these youngster...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32608695652 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64310528647 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599378881988 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8010724724 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.923076923 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229865482837 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793675350161 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055952845692 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147648525065 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135602200639 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.