People's opinions differ as to whether all university students should focus on certain key subject areas or study whatever they want. While I accept that there are some good effects if students only study subjects which are considered useful in the future, I partly believe that students have the rights to study their favourite subjects.
On the one hand, there are some jobs which are considered to be more beneficial for the economy such as medicine, engineering, trade, etc. You will have more job options, career progressions, and even higher salaries if you study one of those career path. A better quality of life is what everybody wants. Finally, a preference to technology or business could lead to new products, strong economy and greater future prosperity.
On the other hand, nobody can predict what areas of knowledge are more likely to prefer in the near future. Maybe some jobs related to creative thinking sills will be admired more than that required technical, practical skills. Furthermore, several jobs like artists, composers, philosophers, historians to name a few have greatly contributed to our spiritual life for a thousand years. As a result, we could not ignore their huge contributions.
In conclusion, I think that the opinion of encouraging students to choose their major subjects freely has positive consequences outweighed the negative effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 25, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Peoples opinions differ as to whether all university students should focus on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, if, may, so, while, as to, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 220.0 315.596192385 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28636363636 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78651934905 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.663636363636 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0817779218 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.727272727 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6363636364 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307763423644 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895273015291 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892148382543 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156669787766 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11163834479 0.056905535591 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.