People's opinions differ as to whether all university students should focus on certain main subject areas or study whatever they want. While I accept that there are some beneficial effects if students only study subjects which are considered useful in the future, I partly believe that students have the right to learn their favorite career fields.
On the one hand, there are some jobs which are supposed to be more beneficial for the economy such as medicine, engineering, trade, etc. You will have more job options, career progressions, and even higher salaries if you study one of those career paths. A better quality of life is what everybody wants. Finally, a reference to technology or business could lead to new products, a strong economy, and greater future prosperity.
On the other hand, nobody can predict what areas of knowledge are more likely to prefer in the future. Maybe some jobs related to creative thinking skills will be admired more than that required technical, practical skills. If this were the case, we need more workers in the creativity field. Furthermore, several jobs such as artists, composers, philosophers, historians have enormously contributed to our spiritual life for a thousand years. As a result, we could not ignore their contributions.
In conclusion, I think that the opinion of encouraging students to choose their main subjects freely has positive consequences outweighed the detrimental effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Peoples opinions differ as to whether all university students should focus on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, if, may, so, while, as to, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 230.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27826086957 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7985818715 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647826086957 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9978394543 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.166666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283566104363 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789807653295 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845949814446 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147980534853 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100654155864 0.056905535591 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.