Regarding the issue which subject learners should study in the tertiary education, people hold different views. While it is argued that learning their favorite subjects may bring advantages to them, I believe that participating some classes related to science and technology can provide huge benefits for those students.
On the one hand, it is argued by someone that university students can earn a right to learn subjects which they prefer. Firstly, by doing this, they can have an aspiration to attend those classes chosen by them. For example, being motivated by cultivating fascinating knowledge in favorite classes, learners can try their best to engage in those classes completely and pass the exams with flying colors. Secondly, after graduating from higher education, students can gain decent jobs in some areas which they are interested in. If those students work in fields they would like, they could have a passion on their jobs, which help them to flourish in that work. Consequently, by studying favorite subjects, learners not only can gain a better understanding of those passionate subjects, but also might obtain inspiration in their jobs in the future.
On the other hand, I would agree with those, who believe that subject being useful in the future is the only category which the young generation should study in university. As learning those subjects can enable them to absorb valuable knowledge in science and technology fields, which provide them several rewarded jobs. For instance, today, technology revolution has performed a crucial role in all the fields worldwide, by learning this, students can win decent jobs in some great enterprises such as Google, Microsoft or Apple, then they can obtain millions of dollars. Furthermore, my opinion is that attending some science and technology classes can allow those learners to acquire a better background in that fields. If those university students have a great foundation in technology, they can stand a better chance of being awarded with a decent job.
In conclusion, although it is argued that students should learn some subjects which they like, I believe that learning useful subjects can mostly benefit those learners.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2849002849 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6569727863 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509971509972 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.6087216132 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.5 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0714285714 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6428571429 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329211645614 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1244013727 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072760620822 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227382111307 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437528412486 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.