These days, universities throughout the globe offer diverse sorts of the majors and students have the flexibility in order to choose whatever they want. But there are some claim that students should select field of study that that would be helpful in the future. On the flip side others persistently hold the opposite view and assert that they should be allowed to choose their whatever they are interested in. To me the ideal of later group seems more appealing and I am going to delve to both points of view in this essay.
On the one hand, by constant improvement in the technology, there are some sort of careers that human being would be more in need of that in the near perspective. So, some consultants trigger the determination in the students to pursue those kind of study irrespective students beloved field. The thing is that, in this era future is not anticipatory regarding flourishing of a kind of major. For instance, as a personal experience, about ten years ago teachers and mentor in the high schools persuaded student to choose mechanical engineering to study in universities, though subsequently this field of study possess the most awkward job opportunities in market and industry in Iran. So, it would be wise let students free select whatever they are passionate about no matter what others predict regarding that major.
On the other hand, it is often proposed by some scientist that all could see their ideals and meet their prosperous future in all universities fields. Not only they would have the chance to secure their dream job. Either working and studying in the field field that have affection for individual would undoubtedly overcome the obstacles and difficulties in their way more energetically. For example my older brother is a civil engineer, he build and implement construction project and building and is so fulfilled with his job. Furthermore he is in his job for twenty years without gap, although I could not resist in this work more than two year In the light of the fact I want to follow my university major.
To sum up, In my point of view, it would be a feasible thought let students choose their university major with respect to their interest. It is proven that they would be more successful and bright in their major either in universities and workplaces.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...t students should select field of study that that would be helpful in the future. On the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'sorts'?
Suggestion: sorts
...ement in the technology, there are some sort of careers that human being would be mo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
...determination in the students to pursue those kind of study irrespective students beloved ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 618, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...subsequently this field of study possess the most awkward job opportunities in ma...
^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: field
...job. Either working and studying in the field field that have affection for individual woul...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'builds'.
Suggestion: builds
...y older brother is a civil engineer, he build and implement construction project and ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 529, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...lding and is so fulfilled with his job. Furthermore he is in his job for twenty years witho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, for example, for instance, kind of, sort of, to sum up, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87817258883 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.738549277 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522842639594 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0032144106 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.125 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271513254425 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970170434991 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819164804865 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173832708583 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799546392925 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.