Some people think that economic development is the only way to end poverty and hunger while others believe that it is causing damage to the environment and so it should be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Poverty and starvation are a noticeable menace in some parts of the world. Presently, some people assert that the only way to restrain poverty and hunger is to escalate economy. On the contrary, others advocate that economic growth leads to environmental hazards and therefore it must be under prohibition. This essay intends to account for both sides with my perception.
There are multifarious points to shore up the former view. First and the foremost, making endeavors for economic development creates a massive number of employment opportunities for citizens of a nation. To demonstrate, a country aims to make investments in industrialization in order to enhance gross domestic products (GDP). Industries, established in the country, provides a wide range of job opportunities to unemployed workforce. In this way, growing employment figures enables people to earn their two square meals and the problem of hunger seems to be addressed. In addition, the approach of making economic development stimulates the interest of a country towards promotion of business network, commercial dealings, import and export around the world. As a result, manufacturing of goods, shopping and
consumerism get a boost, allowing a country to circulate its money with a smooth flow. Consequently, per person income is supposed to rise in the country in order to vanish hunger and destitution. By contrast, others have conflicting views.
They think that economic development is responsible for making environment conditions worse for entire globe. To make it clear, infrastructural development has to be made in order to accelerate economy.
This comprises the establishment of new roads, hotels, airports and spots for tourism. More noticeably, a greater emphasize is laid over the construction of industries and factories for speeding up the trade and business. Hence, excessive consumption of natural resources such as petrol, diesel, deforestation, production of waste are resulted by such developments. The drawbacks of making economic growth are thus crystal clear.
To recapitulate, undeniably, the role of economic progress in vanishing the concerns such as hunger and destitution is phenomenal. However, in my opinion, overlooking preservation of ecosystem is taking human survival towards an alarming stage. Thence, it is extremely imperative to make collaborated efforts to maintain our ecosystem by controlling excessiveness of greed for economic growth and choosing eco-friendly lifestyle.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, look, so, then, therefore, thus, as to, in addition, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2128.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68983957219 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30693215537 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598930481283 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1611689716 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7272727273 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188018618047 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049850033328 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512301677086 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930779281772 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669051681243 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.