Some people think that government should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sport or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Social members have sparked off a heated controversy over whether extreme sports should be banned or not. Whereas their discernible minuses should not be overlooked, I believe that people should be allowed to take up any physical activities.
On the one hand, many residents believe in the implication of outlawing extreme sports with social health betterment. Indeed, this policy may acts as a deterrent for citizen to getting involved with dangerous disciplines, in which their high probability of injuries may leave them out of condition. For example, when the UK government introduced an official ban upon bungee jumping, there was a significant decline in the number of life-threatening conditions, reported by nationwide hospitals. Therefore, it can be predicted that a tightened control over a wide variety of extreme sports will enormously contribute to an enhanced public level of robustness. In contrast, if residents are granted permission to play them, they are more likely to venture the health on risky activities, which may create a medical burden due to unexpected injuries.
On the other hand, I concur with the view that people should have freedom of selecting sporting disciplines, regardless of their level of danger due to two major reasons. Firstly, it is taking sensible precautions that can make the idea of banning extreme sports on safety grounds unreasonable. Indeed, when players are fully equipped with such essential sports gears as helmets or seat belts, which can prevent themselves from injuries, they will be able to tackle any security concern. Secondly, there has been a consensus that only by themselves are people’s health status taken responsibility. Therefore, if the government prohibits all activities that carry health risks, this may be considered as a redundant policy, or even an infringement upon personal privacy.
In brief, while others support a ban on dangerous sports, I opine that they should be taken up freely by the entire population.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in brief, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41401273885 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99636851351 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614649681529 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5823334632 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.769230769 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211394944748 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768736449 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759361701873 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150886249931 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628912787642 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.