Some people think that the government wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view

It is firmly believed by many people that financing is arts are nothing but an inappropriate use of money. The also emphasized to spend that money in other crucial sectors instead of arts. However, from my own perspective view I think that a handsome amount of money can be spending to preserve and develop the art culture.
Admittedly, there are few Justifications that forcing few people to believe that financing in art is squandering.For Example: Country like Bangladesh is still fighting with poverty. In addition, many people are dying for food. As well as, many of them are not getting proper medication when they need it very badly. Even a huge percentage of population in Bangladesh is illiterate. When a country like this still fighting for its basic needs, then how come it can be a good idea to focus on arts. Specifically, People will not die without arts, but you cannot keep them alive or healthy without their basic human needs.
At the same time, Art is a cultural heritage. Before we had town, cities, economics, politics and even agriculture, we had arts. It is an obvious connection with our ancestor. Moreover, Investing on arts can boost a country’s economy. To a very clear example: Every year a huge number of people visit Spain and France for their enriched art culture. Clearly, it is not only boost the economy but also organize our life and bring happiness in our life as well.

To conclude, it is clear that, Art is as crucial as our basic needs. Art can not only help us to fulfill our basic needs by improving our economy through its different form but also it can enhance the quality of our life.

Votes
Average: 3.6 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 114, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e that financing in art is squandering. . For Example: Country like Bangladesh is...
^
Line 2, column 623, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ealthy without their basic human needs. At the same time, Art is a cultural heri...
^^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it can enhance the quality of our life.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, well, for example, i think, in addition, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73426573427 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65176710621 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573426573427 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2165376399 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.2222222222 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8888888889 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159514827003 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048118631685 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438908386682 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097907755996 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687841682241 0.056905535591 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.0946893788 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.