People have different views about whether the government should deliver financial support to art creators or not. While I argee that this incentive could benefits a small group of individuals, I would argue that governments should allocate money to other priorities.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why artists should receive financial support from the government. The first reason is that financial assistance from the government will attract more participation to art industry. In contemporary society, the evaluation of people toward the importance of arts is less significant than before. As a result, artists may have a hard time making a living in such society. Financial support will be the encouragement for many people, especially the youth to engage in art production. The second reason is that due to the rise of copyright infringements, many artists refuse to continue their work. Many art creators are suffering from illegal downloading and mass reproduction of their arts, which means artists are usually in financial unstable condition, which needs the government's help.
On the other hand, I believe that providing financial support for artists is not governments' responsibility. Firstly, renowned artists usually make a killing. Many famous artists are having a wealthy life and, therefore, such assistances are unnecessary. For example, a well-known Vietnamses singer/composer named Sơn Tùng MTP is listed in top 30 youngest billionaires in Vietnam. Secondly, taxes should be spent for other priorities like the development of the education system or health car sector, which will benefit the whole society, not a small group of people. Such support from the government for artists could raise certain questions among taxes payers.
In conclusion, I believe that provide financial support for artists should not be one of governments' problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...While I argee that this incentive could benefits a small group of individuals, I would a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52249134948 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00526949475 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560553633218 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9185995388 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.75 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280492992595 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10518354343 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740631095005 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208030065204 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443191506707 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.