Determining the most urgent priority for government spending has been high on agenda for decades. While many people appreciate issues like environment or cost, I opine that the authority should channel its budget into improving public transportation.
On the one hand, the importance of many priorities is considered to dominate that of state-run transport system because of several reasons. Firstly, although faster public means of transport is beneficial, surveys show that they bring about an inadequate outcome. For example, it was reported that despite a 10-percent gain in speed of light rail transport, its utilization did not obtain a proportional increase in New York, making the state’s project an unwise decision. By contrast, a spending for tackling other heated challenges like environmental degradation, or soaring crime rates can contribute to a comprehensive improvement, the benefits of which can be reaped by people around the country rather than in a narrow region. As an organ responsible for assuring social equality, it will be acceptable if the government prioritizes its expenditure on these obstacles.
On the other hand, I concur with the view that funding should be provided to upgrade public transport systems. From an economic perspective, there has been a consensus that faster vehicles can speed up journey time. Hence, citizens and firms can take advantage from this declined commuting and delivery duration, leading to a higher profit because of a lower overhead cost. Additionally, allocating resources to public transport infrastructure, the authority is thought to adopt a multi-purpose policy, which resolves an excessive load of problems. Indeed, expanding and upgrading public transport provision is expected to discourage uses of private ones and, therefore, ease traffic flow. Not only does this help prevent traffic congestion but also reduces contamination of volatile organic compounds, the major cause of air pollution.
In brief, while not disavowing impacts of other issues, it seems to me that a faster public transportation should be prioritized by states.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tation should be prioritized by states.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in brief, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61059190031 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11403714128 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657320872274 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.549822564 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.642857143 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197719718611 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655025932859 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059403903975 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130996049597 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320551431067 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.