Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
It is argued that the nation what is a host of global sports event has numerous advantages. While there are some drawbacks that caused by hosting an international event, I firmly agree that the benefits outweigh the disadvantages.
On the one hand, hosting an international sports event can lead to a blast in development, especially developing countries. Firstly, national authorities need to renovate and expand infrastructure and facilities for welcoming preparation. This is an opportunity for government to stimulate domestic investment finance budget for construction that cut down on national financial burden. For exchange, the local authorities allow enterprises that subsidize take place their banners that show off their services and products in public area. Secondly, there will be a plenty of visitors who come to host country not only for watching the event but also for traveling before and during the sports event. This gives rises chances for the nation to develop and advertise its own hospitality. For example, instead returning their own countries, visitors can stay for a few days to explore sceneries and culture of the host nation.
On the other hand, the huge number of tourists who come to the country hosting for the international sports event can lead to some issues about environment and social safety. A massive load of visitors that gather in a specific area cause preasure on local sanitary systems. In additional, those who do not have perspective of environmental protection are likely to litter or do not classify rubish. This gives rises concerns about how to deal with tons of garbage that dispose to habitat. Besides, those who come from overseas can be one of factor that cause some social issue such as fraud, robbery, violence.
In conclusion, although there will be some drawbacks that cause by becoming an hosting country for a global sports event, the benefits of the hosting these events outweigh the disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...hat the nation what is a host of global sports event has numerous advantages. While t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...lso for traveling before and during the sports event. This gives rises chances for the...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...e country hosting for the international sports event can lead to some issues about env...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e some drawbacks that cause by becoming an hosting country for a global sports eve...
^^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...ecoming an hosting country for a global sports event, the benefits of the hosting thes...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25714285714 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8844130686 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552380952381 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3883018428 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252260285485 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909796144374 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831278039924 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188400101329 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563003980867 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.