Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects. Others say it causes the loss of national identities. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the era of globalization, there is a controversy over whether the impacts of increasingly integrated business and cultural communication on nations are advantageous or losing the national identity. Despite the decreased values of culture it may create, I personally believe that the process offers remarkable merits for economic development and cultural values.
On the one hand, it can be undeniable that the increasing interaction worldwide would result in cultural convergence for the involved countries, which may do away with their national distinctive values and customs as a consequence. For instance, although the establishment of trade associations such as ASEAN, NATO,... has fostered economic growth and regional peace for member countries, it has likely eliminated unique values of culture and trade due to the mutual principles and treaties that those nations have to follow. Therefore, the national identity can be threatened at this point.
On the other hand, there can be numerous advantages in terms of developing the uniqueness of cultures and economy. First, the multilateral trade agreements between parties, which usually stems from the increasing business, can assist those countries with the removal of tariff barriers. As a result, not only can the trading costs be reduced, but the market will also witness higher consumption demands in the long term. Second, global citizens can access diverse cultures when numerous countries become closely integrated with each other. This can facilitate local tourism and allow foreigners to explore exclusive values from different cultures. Hence, if cross-cultural communication kept increasing in this way, national customs could be widespread all over the world and bring many developing potential instead of being faded.
In conclusion, while the process of commercial and cultural integration may have some drawbacks, I still strongly suppose that it has created a positive influence on trade expansion and enhanced a sense of national customs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 315, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...f trade associations such as ASEAN, NATO,... has fostered economic growth and regi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66118421053 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00848400718 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611842105263 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7476809645 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.384615385 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169670495409 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612393496368 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411615151079 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105562017237 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185920002232 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.