Some people think that increasing communication usage of computers and mobile phones by young people has had a negative effect on their reading and writing skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree
In the modern life, communicating via the internet by using computers and smart phones becomes more and more popular trend. Several people argue that this technology influences negatively on ability of reading ang writing. I partly agree with this view.
To begin with, there are some advantages for young people to use advanced technology for improving reading and writing skills in daily life. First and foremost, in terms of reading, it creates more convenient conditions for youngsters to read books, magazines or other datas. For example, thanks to computer or mobile phones connecting internet, the young will have a chance to read news at all times. More time children spend on reading, more fluently they read. In addition, it also helps children enhance their writing skills. For instance, young people can learn the style of writing of other people. Due to the fact that there is a variety of information on the internet and some of them are free, young people can realize what structure sentences are good for their essays. One other advantages is that computer can accelerate in editting information. For example. youngsters can modify the wrong words or sentences by deleting and replacing them rather than rewriting totaly as previously.
On the other hand, this method communication has some drawbacks. Firstly, regarding of reading, young people can be confused by complex information and unaccurate data sources. It is clearly seen that there are a huge number of websites and informations on the internet which are out of control, people can be impacted negatively through grapvine, and as a result, it may affect badly on childrens' behaviours. Moreover, some applications and programs such as Microsoft Office is installed to fix the mistakes automatically, therefore, young people do not have enough time to understand their erros and have the same faults in other time.
In conclusion,. although there are some disadvantages of interacting on the internet throughout computers and mobile phones, I strongly believe that this method plays an integral part in improving writing and readind skills for young people provided that it is spent in a proper way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 872, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Youngsters
...e in editting information. For example. youngsters can modify the wrong words or sentences...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...e faults in other time. In conclusion,. although there are some disadvantages o...
^^
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...aults in other time. In conclusion,. although there are some disadvantages of interac...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... young people provided that it is spent in a proper way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24285714286 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7804286852 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554285714286 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.0745546778 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.941176471 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5882352941 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3529411765 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298134124042 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838677542889 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558825634894 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174229472934 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252134325105 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.