Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Air pollution is the biggest problem for the people in current generation and it would increase more and more if it has not been stopped. Some global communities as well as people think that international car-free day is the best way to get the pollution to decrease .I believe that other more effective methods should be taken into considerations.
If people do not travel by car on that day, they have to resort to other means of transport such as walking, bus or subway. After that, these environmentally – friendly transportation can become their preferred choice.There is a common benifit that a car-free day can reduce air-pollution . the carbon dioxide emission from exhausted fumes may be significantly cut off
I think the car-free day is not enough to address severe air contamination. the government should improve higher taxes on cars like it has been many developing countries. Only after this policy is applied can fewer people afford cars, and consequently car density on roads fall with the decline of its emissions. Furthermore, other developed nations should invest in energy-efficient engines so that commuters can still benefit from the safety and comfort of cars and the quantity of pollutants in the atmosphere is controlled. For example, electric cars can be a feasible alternative for petroleum ones for eco-friendly purposes.
In conclusion, the program that encourage motorists to give up their cars for one day is a good idea to deal with air pollution, but government need to simultaneously take other measures such as car price increase and encourage use public transportation, invest in energy-efficient engines
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot been stopped. Some global communities as well as people think that internation...
^^^
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...est way to get the pollution to decrease .I believe that other more effective meth...
^^
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...t way to get the pollution to decrease .I believe that other more effective metho...
^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...ation can become their preferred choice.There is a common benifit that a car-free day...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... a car-free day can reduce air-pollution . the carbon dioxide emission from exhaus...
^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...car-free day can reduce air-pollution . the carbon dioxide emission from exhausted ...
^^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t off I think the car-free day is not enough to address severe air contaminati...
^^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...gh to address severe air contamination. the government should improve higher taxes ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, so, still, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25757575758 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21035171509 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621212121212 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.7239808194 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.8 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277034425374 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102919448918 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832409145794 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16640593016 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510641264035 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.