Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field, as long as they are playing well. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Sports is a source of entertainment as well as a billion dollar industry which boosts the nation’ economy. As said by most of the viewers that it is completely all right for sports players to lash out during or after the play. I disagree with this statement. This essay will state the reasons why this practice is unethical.
The majority of the youngsters emulate their idols. Which makes it evident that the harsh behaviour of sports players can have a negative influence on the people who hero-worship them. Moreover, it would certainly leave a bad impression on the younger generation and encourage them to be verbally abusive. Like, many teenagers use the kind of language which is often used by their favourite celebrities. Therefore, this type of engagement is unhealthy for people of all ages.
Overall, it is unfair to conduct a match in the field permitting foul language towards the opponents. Because it invites aggression and causes distraction among the competitors . I believe that an activity should solely be based upon the talent required for the game rather than using verbal assault. Hence, it is a wrong strategy to outsmart the player. Any sort of distraction at the time of play ought to be strictly avoided. In addition to that, If a person makes frequent derogatory remarks, then it becomes an unbreakable habit which is absolutely unprofessional. For instance, some cricketers swear on the ground to either vent their feelings or to score by infuriating the rival. This system is unjustified and consequently hampers the image of the sports player.
To summarise, it is essential to maintain decorum, be it an amateur or a professional. Their attitude and conduct reflect their personality. If these ways are followed, then they will be setting a bad example for their followers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... of the youngsters emulate their idols. Which makes it evident that the harsh behavio...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...causes distraction among the competitors . I believe that an activity should solel...
^^
Line 5, column 758, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...d consequently hampers the image of the sports player. To summarise, it is essenti...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...um, be it an amateur or a professional. Their attitude and conduct reflect their...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, kind of, sort of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07357859532 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90684059113 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61872909699 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.54466957 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.85 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.95 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142716367334 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045028000941 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704967866194 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842427877159 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511438367131 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.