Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field, as long as they are playing well. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Sports are gaining prevalence all over the world. Presently, showing misbehaviour on or off the field by professional athletes towards rivals has been quite comman phenomena. It is stated that this tendency is fair as long as they are performing outstandingly for their teams. Here, I would like to discard with the given statement.
There are numerous points to endorse my point of view. First and foremost, the spirit of sportsmanship is likely to disappear among players under the approach.
Every player has different thinking and being short tempered for some players is not a rare thing to imagine. Such sportsman, for instance, may take misbehaviour of his rival very personal while playing the game. He is supposed to become violent on the ground and playground might turn into battle ground.More noticeably, such player could play more aggressively for personal revenge rather than playing according to team situation in the match. It is, therefore clear that allowing misbehave on the ground could be detrimental for the spirit of sportsmanship.
Further emphasizing on my point of view, the violence caused by the misbehavior on the playground often sets disgraceful examples in front of upcoming players.
Taking a real life example into consideration, once Mithel starc, an Australian bowler, did sledging to Kieran Pollard who was playing against starc in a cricket match. On the very next bowl, Pollard kept himself away from the pitch because of his broken concentration due to sledging but Starc delivered very fast bowl towards his legs intentionally. In response, Pollard threw the bat towards starc in extreme anger. Later, the players of both teams and umpires came into action in order to overcome extreme tense situation. Needless to say, such situations often set bad examples in front of young sports learners and turn sports into controversies between two teams or nations.
To recapitulate, undeniably, being aggressive and uncontrolled emotions are the natural things to experience while playing. This arouses players to misbehave and sometime it brings twist in the game. However, I still believe that misbehavior on the play ground invites major shortcomings and must be controlled as much as possible.
Comments
Hello sir, how are you ? I…
Hello sir, how are you ?
I hope you are in good health
Please check my essay n give me deserving band score
Hello sir, I am waiting for…
Hello sir, I am waiting for your response to my essay ??
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 305, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: More
...layground might turn into battle ground.More noticeably, such player could play more...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...tal for the spirit of sportsmanship. Further emphasizing on my point of view, the vi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'sledge'
Suggestion: sledge
...Mithel starc, an Australian bowler, did sledging to Kieran Pollard who was playing again...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1891.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32676056338 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8841218933 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630985915493 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4982649425 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5263157895 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6842105263 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73684210526 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138911656817 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396631996412 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453571023942 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0628989865572 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710202579998 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.