Some people think that it is good for a country’s culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others think that it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Residents are observed to have acquired a taste for international films or TV shows, and supported their imports rather than productions of domestic ones. While not disavowing their significance, I believe that locally-made ones also play an important role in the country.

On the one hand, international movies and TV programs have been widely recognized as beneficial for nations. Indeed, as global integration has been promoted, leading to a thirst for exploration among citizens, these works are of great use in satisfying their demand of assimilating knowledge about other cultures. For example, the movie “Descendent of the Sun” made an indelible impression on audiences by evoking an atmosphere of Korean army, and depicting local youngsters’ enthusiasm for peacekeeping mission, which were not conveyed by its Vietnamese version. Another advantage is that these programs can help domestic artists broaden their experience. Particularly, accomplished foreign actors having a dazzling display of their talents are role models for local professions, especially in countries where film industry is still in its infancy like Vietnam.

On the other hand, I believe that the necessity of local films and TV shows should not be underestimated. From educational prospective, locally-made programs are effective tools for reflecting nations’ history and stimulating juveniles’ interest and national pride. While history is being reported as “boring” by students, such products like documentary films can be an attractive approach to dig lessons deep into their minds. Additionally, compared to its foreign counterparts, local programs seem more efficient in cultural expressions. Specifically, if a foreign movie is imported, impositions of censorship will be applied to eliminate any contents against codes of conduct. By contrast, rarely must domestic ones undergo that process thanks to producers’ deep comprehension of national cultural values.

Briefly, it seems to me that both imports and production of TV programs should be equally treated because of their positive impacts on society.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of their positive impacts on society.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, if, so, still, thus, while, for example, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89067524116 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39594596582 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639871382637 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2608509058 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.857142857 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178545893207 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622839770152 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0202981681576 0.0667982634062 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103719538965 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330228436087 0.056905535591 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.