Some people think a job not only provides income but also social life.Others think it is better to develop social life with people you do not work with. Discuss both view
It is difficult to answer whether it is better to increase social life with the co-worker because this matter has always two sides to take into consideration.
On the one hand, some commentators argue that their job not only brings them good income level but also abundant social network. Firstly, since most of the time of adults is closed to their co-workers - eight hours per day, the social life should be improved in the work environment. For example, in order to enhance the efficiency of work the training courses would be organised to practice the teamwork skill. In other words, while enterprises attach special importance to collaboration between their staffs, each member should also take it to build his own social life. Secondly, the relationships which stem from work enable us not only the smooth business but also the specialist knowledge as well as the social understanding. For example, when the time work is over, the discussion between the colleagues is related to more or less their job. That is why they could have to chance to resolve many problems surprisingly.
On the other hand, a number of individuals believe that it should not develop social life with coworkers. The first reason is that this relationship could be abused to unworthy promotion. A typical example is corruptions or the fawning attitude with the higher authorities in many developing countries including Vietnam. Another reason is that it is not easy to be the most objective in the work if the social life turns into more profound. Therefore, there are the assessments which are considered inaccurately could lead to the mistaken decisions.
In conclusion, no matter which the way is to improve social life, there are drawbacks and merits that impact on our own productivity as well as relationships and vice versa.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is difficult to answer whether it is ...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... two sides to take into consideration. On the one hand, some commentators argue...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o resolve many problems surprisingly. On the other hand, a number of individua...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...could lead to the mistaken decisions. In conclusion, no matter which the way i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, more or less, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05333333333 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82194185143 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576666666667 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7952837692 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.285714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289587292681 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911548059461 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065976010058 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160339807691 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450131113316 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.