Some people think a job not only provides income but also a social life. Others think it is better to develop social life with people you do not work with. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
For adults, working is one of the most important aspects of life. Many people believe that it provides people with not only salary but also social connections that people get from a job while others argue that social life should be completely divorced from the workplace.
It is understandable why a job can provide us not just salary but also social network. Workers are spending an increasing amount of time at workplaces other than at home or for other purposes. Since they interact with coworkers on a daily basis, fostering colleague relationships is a good way to hone communication skills and avoid having a sense of isolation. Supportive and trusting relationships help employees stay engaged and feel at ease, which contribute greatly to a sustainable social life. Moreover, establishing interpersonal relationships at workplace means having more friend materials. Colleagues who work in the same field often share the same interests and targets in the career path, so people can easily get mutual understandings and help each other in tough times such as providing useful advice and financial support.
On the other hand, there are strong reasons why social life should be developed outside the workplace. First, when a working environment become too friendly, there could be a decline in productivity, as workers may fail to efficiently complete their assigned tasks. For example, they might focus more on exchanging pleasantries rather than finishing the heavy workload, which would severely affect the performance of organizations. Another reason is that friendship at workplace can damage one’s career. Leaked information about one’s private life may prevent him or her from promotion opportunities.
In conclusuon, I believe that both building friendship inside or outside workplace has its own merits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45422535211 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02538973342 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654929577465 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2059914222 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.642857143 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258109840348 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078748357661 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923740405287 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156947663157 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128187346791 0.056905535591 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.