Some people think that large, impressive buildings are important for a city. Others believe that the money should be spent on improving schools and hospitals. Discuss both these views and give your own reason.

Government spendings always a matter of controversy among people, everyone have there own view points regarding the matter. Some argue that, the authorities should spend money to construct large impressive buildings to enhance image of the country. while, others think that the same should be spend on more social security measures like hospitals and schools. Both views have it's on advantages, which is detaily outline below.

Skyscrapers and impressive buildings are the face of modern cities or nations. A country's economic strength is analyzed at a glance by its infrastructure facilities. Majority of the developed countries are famous for their tall buildings. For instance, United Arab Emirates holds the record for the tallest building in the world which is Burj Khalifa and city of dubai is receiving thousands of visitors just to see this masterpiece. Furthermore, these building are act as a great revenue generators for the government. They receive money from people who visits this famous building by charging them. Like the Eiffel tower in France, the Fresh government is getting such a lot of money from people who visits this one of the world wonders.

On the contrary, governments can invest this huge amount of money on hospitals and shools to improve the standard of living of it's citizens. It is regimes prime responsibility to provide adequate social security to it's people. Furthermore, for the overall development of the country, it needs healthy and educated people to support the country's economy. On top that nowadays young and energetic people are the driving force of any nations development rather than the big glossy buildings. In addition, a regime's development should be seen from the point of advancements in it's healthcare and education sectors, because those are the prime factors which decides a nations future fate.

To recapitulate, in my opinion the authorities should give equal importance to these three areas for a balanced economic development of the regime. We can not give due importance any of these sectors, a sustainable developmental plan should be adopted to ensure the good future of the nation.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: THERE_OWN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'their own'?
Suggestion: their own
...controversy among people, everyone have there own view points regarding the matter. Some ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ldings to enhance image of the country. while, others think that the same should be s...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
...e, others think that the same should be spend on more social security measures like h...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...tic people are the driving force of any nations development rather than the big glossy ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 505, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'regimes'' or 'regime's'?
Suggestion: regimes'; regime's
...he big glossy buildings. In addition, a regimes development should be seen from the poi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 662, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
...ose are the prime factors which decides a nations future fate. To recapitulate, in my ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, regarding, so, while, as for, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26744186047 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85675217525 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575581395349 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6118906862 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259037525136 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719461959894 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044430963609 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147822540617 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456250210041 0.056905535591 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.