Some people think one of the best ways to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. Others believe there are other solutions that are more effective. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is argued that the ultimate solution to address environmental problems is to raise the fuel price. Other alternative methods, however, are considered more beneficial and superior. This essay will analyze both points of view before jumping to the conclusion that renewable energy and education are the key measures to act against pollution.
Those who claim the efficiency of surging fuel prices mainly believe the root cause of environmental issues is fossil fuels. Tons of exhaust fumes and greenhouse gases are released into the air daily by human operations in industrial zones and through private vehicles. Therefore, the utilization of these transport and factories will be reduced should oil and gas prices rise considerably. In other words, a boost in the cost of fuel can indirectly prevent the release of noxious emissions, which is, eventually, an optimal measure to ensure environmental protection.
Notwithstanding, opponents of the former view side with more sustainable ways to cope with pollution. Among the most efficient ones is the application of clean energy use which focuses mainly on transportation systems. Not only does this method cause less air pollution, it is also viable vertically, making it bloom in high-tech cities. A case in point is Tokyo, where advanced technology and electricity are combined, new means of transport have been invented, allowing commuters to travel long distances with ease and comfort while doing little harm to the surroundings. Another ultimate way to tackle pollution lies in the core of education and training. The awareness of the community will shift positively if they are given correct instructions and convincing enough performances. In fact, none of the abovementioned methods may become feasible without the act of humans which is mostly controlled by their thoughts. As a result, environmental protection rules are highly recommended in school curriculums and advertisements to boost awareness.
In conclusion, although both views seem to have some validity, I am of the opinion that advocates the use of renewable resources and education in tackling environmental issues.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50151057402 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11237198534 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652567975831 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9827263371 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.8125 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172159304915 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491118861518 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520531783085 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109332284331 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453803554033 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.