It is argued that , parents have the responsibility to guide children through the right path in order to become good members in the society, while other people oppose this idea and say school and teachers have more responsibility than parents in this regard. This essay examines both side of the arguments with relevant examples before draw a conclusion.
To begin with, the people who support the former view have some reasons to justify their argument. First of all, parents know their children better than teachers and teachers have at least 50 pupils in a class, so they do not have time to give individual attention to each pupil. Since Parents know their children from the birth on wards and they spend more time with children than teachers parents are the good teachers. Therefore, parents can teach children about morality, values and honesty, when they spend time with children. For example, if we ask a child whom he/she like more, the answer will be definitely mother or father. Therefore, they claim that parents are the better teachers for children as they have a emotional and biological attachment towards the children
On the other hand, people having the latter view also put forward some genuine arguments. Firstly,teachers are well trained to mould the character of the pupils. During the teachers training course they acquire thorough knowledge about children psychology and particular ways to teach them efficiently. However, parents do not have any authentic knowledge about children psychology and character. Thus, teachers can easily and effectively convince children about the norms and values they need to follow in a society. Another point is, school is a place, where students come from different social background and obviously there is a chance for clashes between students. A teacher can easily notice the misbehavings of children in school and correct them accordingly.
To conclude, I strongly believe parents are the best teachers to advice children about social responsibility in children because of their biological and emotional attachment towards the children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
It is argued that , parents have the responsibility to guid...
^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 pupils in a class, so they do not have time to give individual attention to eac...
^^
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...like more, the answer will be definitely mother or father. Therefore, they claim ...
^^
Line 3, column 724, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tter teachers for children as they have a emotional and biological attachment tow...
^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , teachers
... forward some genuine arguments. Firstly,teachers are well trained to mould the character...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...teach them efficiently. However, parents do not have any authentic knowledge abou...
^^
Line 6, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tional attachment towards the children.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, at least, for example, first of all, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30239520958 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68657379767 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544910179641 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8877846393 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.066666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4666666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230828159786 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829005137911 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341619546365 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145305649185 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297641889853 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.