It is suggested that the government should spend money on developing public transport so that people can use it for free. I completely agree with that opinion because I personally think that the whole public transport system plays a very important role in modern society and therefore needs to be invested.
Firstly, when the public transport system is funded free for people to use, it will benefit both those who do not have personal vehicles and also the environment. People who do not have a car or motorbike will be able to use public transport for free, which means they can save a good amount of money on commuting. Moreover, some public transport such as buses and trains produce less pollutants than the total emissions of cars and motorbikes of many people. Therefore, spending money on providing people with access to public transport will improve air quality and reduce pollution.
Secondly, when the government sponsors means of transport for people to use for free, it will help increase the safety of people when participating in traffic and reduce traffic congestion at peak hours. For example, when people travel by public transport, people will follow a certain speed but cannot go too fast, or when drunk, they can also go home safely by public transport. And when more people travel by public transport, the number of private vehicles traveling in the middle of the road will decrease, thereby reducing pressure on the city's main roads as well as congestion.
In conclusion, for the above reasons, I believe that people should have free use of public transport funded by the government because this has many benefits for both people and the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and therefore needs to be invested. Firstly, when the public transport syste...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun pollutants is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...nsport such as buses and trains produce less pollutants than the total emissions of ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... air quality and reduce pollution. Secondly, when the government sponsors m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ys main roads as well as congestion. In conclusion, for the above reasons, I ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.025 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58201936081 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.9912055631 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 140.7 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411376633892 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190531935934 0.084324248473 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844772048448 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286538873358 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061782295865 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.