Many people argue that the government should fully take responsibility in funding public transport for citizens to freely use. While nobody can deny how intriguing the idea sounds, I personally disagree with this view because there are other ways of getting people's attention on using public transport such as lowering the travel expense for some regular transport or bettering the customer service while using.
To begin with, there are two main reasons why free using public transport sponsored by the government seems like a great idea. One reason is that by entirely funding public transport, the government indirectly helps people out in the cost of living. For example, instead of having to cover for the cost in almost every aspect of life, people will be able to cut off the expense called travel thanks to the funding. Furthermore, once the free using public transport policy is officially announced, there will be a dramatic growth in the number of users. Overtime, the amount of private vehicles appearing on the road will eventually decline to a certain level which will have a great impact on reducing air pollution.
Apart from the practical benefits expressed above, I strongly believe this solution can cause more downsides than benefits to not only the government but also the residents. Firstly, free use of public transport without any responsibility or charging fee will actually raise a carelessness tendency among the people. Knowing the fact that they are not charged for the fees anymore can easily lead them to the idea of doing whatever they want such as littering while traveling or damaging the facilities, there will be absolute chaos. Lowering the travel expense sounds much more reasonable and more likely to be appreciated by the citizens. Secondly, funding the whole public transport results in shortening other welfare.
In conclusion, for the reason I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that the government should not fully fund public transport. In fact, lowering the travel expense and bettering the customer service sounds more resonable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...customer service sounds more resonable.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in short, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2328358209 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63352277226 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558208955224 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.319996431 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.214285714 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323032768521 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114070474448 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713091289567 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198582504744 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675752716121 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.