Some people think that schools should select pupils according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have pupils with different abilities study together. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There are mixed opinions in regard to whether streaming students according to their academic ability into separate classes is utilizable to the education system. Some assert it will be more beneficial to students’ development if they study in mixed abilities classes. However, I believe that it would be more effective and efficient in terms of both teaching and learning when streaming process is implemented.
It is evident that students with various abilities studying together are more likely to achieve positive outcomes in all-round ability development. Mixed abilities classes offer students opportunities to learn from each other, thus, to develop the abilities that were absent from them previously. For example, a student with an excellent academic ability can learn how to dance or paint from peers who are less academic but rather artistic. In this sense, mixed classes encourage students to develop their multi-dimensional abilities rather than solely academic.
Despite the argument above, I believe streaming system generates more benefits to teachers and students. As to teachers, it is more convenient to discover suitable teaching methodologies to accommodate a group of students with similar academic abilities. Compared with mixed classes, in which teachers need to acknowledge the ability differences among each student, streaming classes make it much simpler to teachers. As to students, this system enables them to learn in an effective way, as specific teaching methods, timeframe and teaching materials distributed to different schools in order to obtain more specific learning. In this way, the narrower the spread is, the more convenient the teaching can be and the more effective the learning can be.
To conclude, mixed ability classes encourage students to develop all-round abilities. However, it is the streaming system that facilitates the more specific teaching and learning, which is proved to be more effective and efficient.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o students’ development if they study in mixed abilities classes. However, I beli...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...when streaming process is implemented. It is evident that students with various...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...abilities rather than solely academic. Despite the argument above, I believe st...
^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ents, this system enables them to learn in an effective way, as specific teaching methods, timefram...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he more effective the learning can be. To conclude, mixed ability classes encou...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'thus', 'as to', 'for example', 'in regard to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.203647416413 0.247107183377 82% => OK
Verbs: 0.182370820669 0.155533422707 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.12462006079 0.0946595960268 132% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0577507598784 0.0501214627716 115% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0395136778116 0.0437548338989 90% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0942249240122 0.122226691241 77% => OK
Participles: 0.0455927051672 0.0403226058552 113% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.91292371063 2.80594681477 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0668693009119 0.0326793684256 205% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0699088145897 0.0861772015684 81% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0151975683891 0.021408717616 71% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0212765957447 0.011925033212 178% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1976.0 1933.35771543 102% => OK
No of words: 298.0 316.048096192 94% => OK
Chars per words: 6.63087248322 6.12580529183 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20517956788 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.469798657718 0.374742101984 125% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.41610738255 0.28420135186 146% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.325503355705 0.203846283523 160% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.184563758389 0.137316102897 134% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91292371063 2.80594681477 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.037074148 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506711409396 0.56093040696 90% => OK
Word variations: 50.5388212857 60.7387585426 83% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0891783567 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.2857142857 20.7743622355 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1509092518 49.517814964 59% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.142857143 127.492653851 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7743622355 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.571428571429 0.814263465372 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.99599198397 125% => OK
Readability: 62.8964525407 49.1944974215 128% => OK
Elegance: 1.22826086957 1.69124875643 73% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271661871717 0.332605444948 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.106282782633 0.102741220458 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0541311302599 0.0668466124924 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.56004850494 0.534860350844 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0728919320666 0.148594505496 49% => Sentences are similar to each other in a paragraph.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133806769832 0.134430193775 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488270042553 0.0742795772207 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.424648333721 0.324371583561 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.100368681292 0.0638462369009 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213292252363 0.228012699653 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298989089837 0.058150111329 51% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.68436873747 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.41683366733 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 13.0 5.90881763527 220% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.5751503006 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 13.0 10.4468937876 124% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.