Some people think the spread of multinational companies and globalization produce positive outcomes for everyone. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Globally, trading and communicating ideas have brought revolutionary change, which has benefited humankind. I partially agree with this statement. In the forthcoming paragraphs, the main ideas, along with the relevant examples will be stated.
Interconnectivity has provided job opportunities to the developing nations and helped them grow economically as well as intellectually; moreover, it has made goods and services available at affordable rates. By the establishment of overseas companies, a plethora of locals is employed. Also, importing raw materials from the countries abroad at lower prices has reduced the manufacturing cost. Like in India, 59% of the population is earning a livelihood because of the business set up by foreign organizations. That is why the worldwide exchange of knowledge, linguistic, cultures, and ideas is needed to bring favorable results.
Despite the advancement in the transportation system, the pollution problem still has not been rectified. Thus, exporting the items from one place to the other has contributed to water and air contamination. It cannot be denied that packages and supplies are frequently dispatched via ships and airplanes, resulting in exhaust fumes, whereas global warming has already badly changed our climate conditions. For instance, according to a recent study, the pollution level has risen to 60% compared to the last decade; not only that, due to the rise in the temperature, many glaciers have melted. Therefore, the impact of this progress has inadvertently invited some negative results.
In a nutshell, the advent of globalization and multinational corporations have uplifted the disadvantaged sectors; on the contrary, the detrimental effects on our mother nature should not be ignored.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for instance, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69696969697 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34841628889 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.693181818182 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1422466385 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.428571429 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101347461623 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365685415652 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726958933984 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0592614159615 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429378252145 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.17 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.