Some people think the spread of multinational companies and globalization produce positive outcomes for everyone. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Trading globally and communicating the ideas universally have brought revolutionary change, which has benefited humankind. I partially agree with this statement. In the forthcoming paragraphs the main ideas along with the relevant examples will be stated.
Interconnectivity has created job opportunities for developing nations and helped them grow economically as well as intellectually; moreover, it has made goods and services available at affordable rates. By the establishment of overseas companies, a plethora of locals is employed. Also, importing raw materials from the countries abroad at lower prices has reduced the manufacturing cost. Like in India, 59% of the population is earning a livelihood owing to the fact that of the business set up by foreign organizations. That is why the worldwide exchange of knowledge, linguistic, cultures, and ideas is needed to bring favorable results.
Despite the advancement in the transportation system, the pollution problem still has not been rectified. Thus, exporting the items from one place to the other has contributed to water and air contamination. It cannot be denied that packages and supplies are frequently dispatched via ships and airplanes, resulting in exhaust fumes, whereas global warming is already a leading cause of imbalance in climate conditions. For instance, according to a recent study, the pollution level has risen to 60% compared to the last decade, not only that, due to the extreme rise in the temperature, a number of glaciers have melted. Therefore, the impact of this progress has inadvertently invited adverse results.
In a nutshell, the advent of globalization and multinational corporations has uplifted the disadvantaged sectors; on the contrary, it would be irresponsible to neglect the detrimental effects on the planet.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for instance, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62181818182 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38395631334 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669090909091 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3936574235 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.428571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108374493397 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381738262325 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703770859518 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649441407036 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047020959154 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.12 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.