Technology has continually been developing throughout the world. The advancement of technology, like all other recent, routine yet fundamental phenomena, is one of the most important issues that has been addressing amongst academics, statesmen or even ordinary people. It has also been considered that technological progress can only have positive or beneficial effects on our lives. Nevertheless, others dispute this. I would argue that the positive effects of progress outweigh the negative.
No technological progress is more true of this proverb than industrial machinery within all fields. Take for example, in terms of agricultural and food industry we can clearly see the advanced machines that have come to our aid. Therefore, the manufacture of agricultural products is faster, more functional or even easier than previous centuries. On the other hand, it is often said that food products are produced without manual intervention. Some cite, this has led to the unemployment of many workers in the agricultural and food factories. One might think that these agricultural machineries should not have been invented which is intensively illogical. It has also been reported that so-called agricultural progress adversely affects human helth due to eating less organic productions - or so the saying goes.
Consequently, the development of the agricultural and food industry, despite its shortcomings and few removable disadvantages, still is the best way to produce human food products. To hatling all few bad effects of agricultural industry in the future, food industry engineers will have produced more organic and healthy food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, statesmen or even ordinary people. It has also been considered that technologi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60887096774 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14254397772 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.405832863 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3571428571 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0729623366616 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0289993100608 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307730023064 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0466996688224 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330825015769 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.