Some people think they have the right to use as much as fresh water they want, others believe government should control the use of water as it limited resource. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that water is fundamental to our existence. While some people hold a view that the government should take heed of the consumption of clean water, I believe that residents have the right to use it of their own free will.
On the one hand, there are several reasons as to why the central official should put water under public control. Water exists in nature, so that it is a public good and everyone should have the right and freedom to use it. If the entire control of the water resources is given to the central government it will create lots of chaos, delay and problems in managing the water supply. For example, India is more of an agricultural country where the main need of water is for irrigation purposes. Giving the control to central government will streamline the process.
On the other hand, I believe that the authority should control the source of water. The first and foremost reason is due to the shortage of water in the near future. It is obvious that the increasing number of population leads to the growing demand of water. If inhabitants have free access to water, they might not see the need of water saving. As a result, water scarcity is inevitable. Moreover, this will prevent private companies from privatizing water supplies. Since there are numerous companies focused on earning a profit based on water management, they tend to provide low quality water or fouled water with chemicals to residents, which would lead to deadly outbreaks of cholera and other water-borne diseases such as eyesore, diarrhea.
In conclusion, I assert that the national state is well-advised to impose restrictions on how water should be used and how much of it each person should be permitted to use.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch as eyesore, diarrhea. In conclusion, I assert that the national state is well...
^^
Line 4, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at the national state is well-advised to impose restrictions on how water should ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80471380471 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59715807732 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552188552189 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9167397454 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41511592032 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139353021119 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737776017463 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24733592066 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473717909555 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.