Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think it is better to work for different organisatios.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Today, working as part of the corporate world is a normal way of life. Easily, it can be a person's bread and butter. While some professionals work within the same company all their lives, there are few people thinking the opposite, that it is best to work from one organisation to another. Personally, I side with the latter's ideals and rationale.
On one hand, staying with a single company has its own merits and flaws. One good example is career growth, a professional who toiled most of his years for the same institution will most likely be rewarded with promotions, thus, providing a heftier pay. Another instance is job stability and security brought about by an employee's tenureship. However, there are also some disadvantages, such as career deadends, partly because they were not exposed to other type of works, that once company closures happen they find it hard to look for a similar job or a new employment entirely.
On the other hand, working for different types of organisation also has its own advantages and short- comings. For instance, people who transfers from one employment to another are seen to be more adaptive with the changing working environment as they can readily adjust to new companies policy and vision. Another good reason for a person to change employment is the promise of a huge increase in salary and benefits as compared to the aliment wages being offered to them. In spite of these, concerns regarding career growth hamper's the practice of jumping from one organisation to the next, and is regularly frowned upon by others.
In summary, long term and short term employments have their own different selling points and drawbacks. For me, however, I can be more relaxed and confident knowing that I can manage to work on different areas as experience have taught me by working on a number of different employments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an employee' or simply 'employees'?
Suggestion: an employee; employees
...stability and security brought about by an employees tenureship. However, there are also som...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...nment as they can readily adjust to new companies policy and vision. Another good reason ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, regarding, so, thus, while, for instance, in summary, such as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94585987261 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72376416617 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576433121019 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.109722043 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.928571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313790951726 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991505749918 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100902927881 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194945278961 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727698949161 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.