some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both of these views and give your opinion.
Taking for granted that the new millennial generation tends to move from a job to the next much more frequently than our predecessor. Accordingly, a substantial proportion of people has been prompted to have a vigorous debate to diversify the workplace. On the other hand, others think that a life career should be at the sole company. In fact, I am with the opinion which encourages individuals to work for multiple corporates.
The first argument believes that working at the same job throughout life could have two key advantages. Firstly, the opportunity of getting promoted is higher than newcomers. This is because of not only their considerable experience they gained but also their extensive knowledge they acquired. As a result, these long-term employees will win the highest accolade promotion due to their tremendous loyalty. Secondly, when the dwell time of a worker is long, he logically reaps a financial reward. For instance, it might be either a higher salary or a decent pension plan.
In contrast, switching among workplaces contributes to transacting with several businesses, so it assists subordinates with opening their minds. Moreover, employees who seek diversity in workplace establish effective communication, and promote career advancement as well, for they saw multiple operating models, cultures, technologies and industries. In other words, if fresh graduate spends three years at an employer in Egypt; afterwards, he travels to work at another firm in Asia. Consequently, he will, inevitably, develop great skills such as mental agility as well as impressive job performance.
In conclusion, fast career path and great retirement plan are features of staying at the same organisation for entire life. Nevertheless, people who prefer to move among companies rather than connect with one workplace will broaden their horizons and will be more active. In my opinion, I believe that switching among workplaces is more effective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Taking for granted that the new millenni...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...als to work for multiple corporates. The first argument believes that working...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...heir tremendous loyalty. Secondly, when the dwell time of a worker is long, he logically ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her salary or a decent pension plan. In contrast, switching among workplaces ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... well as impressive job performance. In conclusion, fast career path and grea...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44590163934 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04350962208 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668852459016 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0030930709 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7058823529 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.2941176471 7.06120827912 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218133041955 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06065331893 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537926786823 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130279414458 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432478279642 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.