Some think that buildings should be constructed with functionality in mind, as it is more important than design. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, people have different views about the role and purpose of a building. The issue of what is more important: function or design remains a source of controversy. From my perspective, I suppose to say that these elements are equally important to a structure.
On the one hand, those in favour of the viewpoint that the main role of a building should be prioritised might state their main reasons as follows. It goes without denying that a building must serve its aim in the most effective ways. For instance, a museum has to exhibit a collection of interesting artifacts and teaching visitors something they did not previously know. If the museum neither explain emphatically nor introduce antique objects, the guests may be bored and angry for not achieving their purpose. Therefore, that museum will be knocked out soon due to its lack of serving.
On the other hand, others argue that building should also be well-designed. The first and foremost explanation would be that a building’s architecture embodies the characteristic of the owners, enterprises or even the whole city. Without these architectures, our cities would be much less interesting and attractive. A further reasons would be simply that they are works of art. Whether it is contemporary or conventional, they are all landmarks, creating a unique outlooks of the building itself. For instance, Apple sales store has curve glass that make it stand out among others computer enterprises. Finally, it is evident that they will attract more tourist, contributing to the development of the country’s turnover. In Ba Na Hills, for example, with its fantastic European looks, hundreds of visitors come to see and contribute a huge amount of money to the city.
In conclusion, from my perspective, I find that it is more important for a structure to be well-designed and function smoothly at the same time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'outlook'?
Suggestion: outlook
...ey are all landmarks, creating a unique outlooks of the building itself. For instance, A...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1525974026 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09139163264 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594155844156 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4436628709 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3529411765 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05882352941 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186625651279 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545962233177 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518727972029 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118581769579 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304323351362 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.