Some think that buildings should be constructed with functionality in mind, as it is more importance than design. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, having the modern architecture with an abstract design become a status symbol for particular any region or the country. Nevertheless, some traditionalists claim that in order to give a unique and magnificent look ,the basic intended functionality of particular any building is ignored. To my mind, as attractive architecture become a prerequisite, especially in the 21st century, the repugnant impacts can be addressed by the government with the precise administration.
To begin with, people throughout the word , particular in western culture, easily get influenced by the unique building architectures. As a result of this, the region - with abstract buildings - can gradually transform to the tourist trap and sometimes, it plays a vital role in providing support to the economic structure of the region. Seen in this light, the unique architecture is absolutely needed in order to get monetary benefits and to stay in limelights.
On the other hand, the architecturer , sometimes, gives the priority to the outlook only rather than the basic reliability and robustness of the building.By this, often, the building needs a maintenance in the short duration. Not even this, the buildings more than 100 storeys needs other additional amenities such as powerful lifts, oxygen level maintenance, and so on.The Grand Bhuj Khalifa in the Dubai - city of gold - is a perfect example for this. Thus, the regional government and engineers need to work excessively behind the construction and maintenance of such unprecedented abstractions.
On a practical note, the government can address the aforementioned negative consequences by putting a limit on the level of the building, especially for those which will use as the professional or residential purpose, in nearer future. This may do a good turn in terms of cost-cutting. Additionally, the regular analysis must introduce for the landmark such as the Eiffel Tower. As consequences of this tests, the level of erosion and strengthens of building give a clear picture about the maintenance of it.
In a nutshell, the cited evidence supports my view that as we cannot stay isolated by constructing same square boxes in the city, the unique and abstract building structure is the must, in the local region. In the future, by the use of aforementioned approaches, we may mitigate the pernicious impacts of it, as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...er to give a unique and magnificent look ,the basic intended functionality of part...
^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...o begin with, people throughout the word , particular in western culture, easily g...
^^
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... On the other hand, the architecturer , sometimes, gives the priority to the ou...
^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
...iability and robustness of the building.By this, often, the building needs a maint...
^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ts, oxygen level maintenance, and so on.The Grand Bhuj Khalifa in the Dubai - city ...
^^^
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...as the Eiffel Tower. As consequences of this tests, the level of erosion and strengt...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'look', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'well', 'such as', 'as a result', 'to begin with', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.23887587822 0.247107183377 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.0889929742389 0.155533422707 57% => OK
Adjectives: 0.11943793911 0.0946595960268 126% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0468384074941 0.0501214627716 93% => OK
Pronouns: 0.016393442623 0.0437548338989 37% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138173302108 0.122226691241 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0234192037471 0.0403226058552 58% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.26256115477 2.80594681477 116% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0210772833724 0.0326793684256 64% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.15925058548 0.0861772015684 185% => Less determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0210772833724 0.021408717616 98% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00234192037471 0.011925033212 20% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2382.0 1933.35771543 123% => OK
No of words: 381.0 316.048096192 121% => OK
Chars per words: 6.25196850394 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20517956788 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.377952755906 0.374742101984 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.299212598425 0.28420135186 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.246719160105 0.203846283523 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.175853018373 0.137316102897 128% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26256115477 2.80594681477 116% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.037074148 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54593175853 0.56093040696 97% => OK
Word variations: 61.2731568433 60.7387585426 101% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0891783567 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.4 20.7743622355 122% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0169784126 49.517814964 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.8 127.492653851 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.7743622355 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.814263465372 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.99599198397 150% => OK
Readability: 55.3212598425 49.1944974215 112% => OK
Elegance: 2.63076923077 1.69124875643 156% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127300264645 0.332605444948 38% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.118991363063 0.102741220458 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0669174529965 0.0668466124924 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.66552783545 0.534860350844 124% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.142106495701 0.148594505496 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724618520296 0.134430193775 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371472192849 0.0742795772207 50% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.535370978105 0.324371583561 165% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0463917810839 0.0638462369009 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102018732041 0.228012699653 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419945155039 0.058150111329 72% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.68436873747 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 5.90881763527 135% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.