Some think that quality art can be made by anyone while others think that it requires special talent and ability.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Views regarding the production of high-grade art divide. While some maintain that such a task is achievable for everybody, others argue that fine art is exclusively made by those with unique talents. Each view has its validity, which will be considered in the following essay.
On one hand, it is said that highly regarded artworks can made by individuals without any marked inclination to arts. Drawing or writing music may be viewed as a skill that can be acquired and cultivated through time. Art classes, for instance, are organized to facilitate the acquisition of such skill and it is possible that students develop their ability to the point of creating their own original pieces. Interestingly, luck is also a factor to take into account. This can be exemplified by a number of one-hit-wonders in the music industry, as some songs receive widespread acclaim and are deemed iconic despite the lack of remarkable talent in their creators and performers.
On the other hand, some believe the sole variable in the creation of sophisticated art is special talents. These talents can manifest in various forms, including but not restricted to more accurate color recognition and naturally higher musicality. A good example here is Paul McCartney, whose prodigious talents in writing songs have enabled him to write era-defining hits that most songwriters are unable to replicate. Those possessing unique abilities also tend to be more creative and innovative. Unlike ordinary people who follow established patterns, talented individuals tend to diverge from the common approach and experiment with unconventional ideas, as evidenced by the success of trailblazers such as Madonna in contemporary music or Van Gogh in painting.
Considering both views, while it is true that impressive artworks can be made by anyone, I believe that they are more consistently created by uniquely gifted individuals.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, so, while, for instance, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35215946844 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02145176359 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634551495017 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8076849884 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.071428571 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24546607813 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775168682003 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457167753028 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146855684696 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212150821495 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.