It is argued spending money on the advancement of technology in order to discover other planets is a waste of tax revenue. I am of the view that space exploration is beneficial for the human race due to its long-term advantages, and governments should allocate funds to support this goal.
Firstly, space missions have a positive impact on the human body and people's health in general. Experiments performed in space contribute radically to understanding the human body, and especially the effects of aging and sedentary life styles. To illustrate this, studies show that there are many forms of science-investigation conducted in space owing to study radical transformations in space. In this way, scientists understand the impact of reduced levels of physical activity and issues that affect the elderly on Earth. As a result, we should adopt this cutting-edge technology that we have gathered and used to improve our quality of life on Earth.
Secondly, another benefit of space exploration could be its massive impact on education. Astronauts, through their actions are a wonderful motivation for young people to study science, since they show the possibilities of studies in the field of science, technology and engineering. For example, in my country academic institutions organize seminars in which they expose students to NASA astronauts and allow them to discuss a wide range of topics related to space. By developing the necessary technology to reach and explore the Moon and Mars, the governments allow the astronauts to gain more experience and knowledge we still offer to education. Consequently, students may aware of these issues through real discussions instead of youtube videos or other education means.
In conclusion, in my opinion we should definitely continue exploring space because benefits in a long term could be immeasurable for our existence.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, still, for example, in conclusion, in general, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36610169492 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12640155298 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593220338983 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1408329897 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.769230769 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157147582585 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547427337496 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510360967739 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107011728625 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415591916499 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.