Student should study local history instead of world history. Do you agree or disagree?
Over the past few decades, history learning has never failed to draw public attention in many countries around the world. Some people believe that the role of local history to children over that of world history, I completely disagree with this point of view.
In fact, local history is an indispensable part of school’s curriculum for children. Is patriotic escalation that having thorough insights into what happen in the past at one’s locality has brought. Vietnamese, for example, are taught at primary school about how their ancestors defended again invaders and reclaimed sovereignty. Thus, those young children would take pride in their origin and treasure the life they know as it is today. Besides, I believe that it is not only privileged but also responsibility for children to understand their culture values and identity.
In the other hand, it is true that world history shares equally crucial just as local one for young people. Acquiring knowledge of world’s past events would equip learner well-round perspective of life. For example, lesson about World War or feminism protest again women’s abuse and discrimination does have a potential to foster greater understanding variety aspects of life. Furthermore, young people who being taught other country historical backgrounds would be benefited in future. In other words, people accumulating knowledge of this particular field by early age would possess a golden selling point to work at foreign enterprises.
In conclusion, apart from aforementioned features above, I reaffirm that both domestic and international historical background are distinctively equal meanings for children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...storical backgrounds would be benefited in future. In other words, people accumulating kn...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, so, thus, well, apart from, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62204724409 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99498413015 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665354330709 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.286541205 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.846153846 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128768238889 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498582786563 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065212954974 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817580545339 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756589868891 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.