Students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. Do you agree or disagree?
In this concurrent world, it is undoubtedly true that people are surrounded by technological items and use of internet has increased significantly in every areas of society. These days it also affect the library and some people concur that students can access any kind of study material by using internet, so libraries are useless. However, I quibble from them and propound that technology reduce our need to go the library, but it cannot become inessential. In this essay, I will cite light on some reasons why libraries are important, before a logical conclusion is reached.
Adequate evidences are obtainable to substantiate the concept of traditional libraries. The top-notch concrete reason is that people not only go to a library for search and get information from books, but also sit and study there. Because a library provide the peaceful and scholarly atmosphere. In addition, another rationale which hauls me to patron is that a person can take advantage of vast collection of books which he or she cannot afford to buy online books. To uphold my notion, I would qoute an instance of online study materials which not available for free access and people have to subscribe it with some charges. Moreover, the rearmost coherent factor which cannot be neglected is that people can be issued traditional books from the library and read in the comfort of their bed.
What is half full for some, may appear half empty to others. So public in general tend to distinguish that libraries with books are not necessary which has multifarious reasons. To commence with, some people deem that online study allows you to access bundle of knowledge from around the world with only one click. They also uphold that computer gives you a chance to read a book which is not available in library. However, some people do not have computer knowledge and study for a long time infront of screen is not appropriate, because it has some physical side effects.
All in All, I reiterate that there are innumerable strong factors supporting the traditional libraries and in future it cannot become redundant. However, it's contrary can be overlooked. Consequently, I firmly disagree with the given statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affects'?
Suggestion: affects
...ry areas of society. These days it also affect the library and some people concur that...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, in addition, in general, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0467032967 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74409021267 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0081194386 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.055555556 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178600482676 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522281633214 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046649514061 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102891539941 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0139033181765 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.