Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things.
What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to reduce the time children spend watching TV and encourage children to spend more time on active or creative things?
Nowadays, the issue that watching TV in children become a dominant form of recreational than other activities and creativities has aroused a great deal of public attention. Although this concern can be attributed to a whole host of reasons, some feasible solutions should be taken to address this.
There are some contributions to the situation where children show a tendency to spend time watching TV than other creative activities. First, since, telecast have been growing in number as well as quality, there are thousands of attractive entertaining shows, movies and music at disposal with high-resolution graphic, which triggers children's curiosity to binge-watch all day. Intriguing motions and contents on TV makes children glue eyes on, which also make them lose track of time and forget to their priorities, such as studying. Second, by working with full-time schedules, a busy life has pushed modern parents away from their children and leave their kids with television, leading to a lack of care as well as encouragement. This means that they hardly find enough time to play with their offsprings or encourage them to do some healthier activities like painting which makes children resort to watching TV.
Moreover, there are a myriad of measures which must be implemented to address this problem. First, although schools and teachers play a part, the parent's guidance is the most essential solution. It is advised to restrict the amount of time allowed for watching TV in children which can be done by activating the parental control and setting a fixed operating time limit on television. Second, parents should spare more time playing with and encourage their children to take part in creative activities and provide interesting alternatives. For example, parents could form a family sports team that practices on a regular basis which may appeal to children more than TV.
In conclusion, several factors are cited as the causes of children's propensity for adopting the habit of watching TV more than ever before. Children should be guided and encouraged to do more creative work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 917, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h makes children resort to watching TV. Moreover, there are a myriad of measures...
^^^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...o watching TV. Moreover, there are a myriad of measures which must be implemented t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
...h schools and teachers play a part, the parents guidance is the most essential solution...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22848664688 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81310646139 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572700296736 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7622403736 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.857142857 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364980470254 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136848817257 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796140004455 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231182928391 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306419226376 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.