It is a commonly held belief that television is dangerous and ruins family life. Although it could adversely affect households, I believe that it's benefits accruing to families are by no means negligible.
For the first, the most rational justification is that television educates viewers all over the world. Suppliers always try to initiate programs and produce movies to transmit a concept to watchers. A good illustration of this could be TV documentaries or informative series which educate life skills such as social interaction or human values in ethic to the public. Moreover, some programs are provided to teach students courses such as mathematics or geometry and some others could just show children animations. So it serves the particular interests of individuals and groups which is most of the time educational.
Yet another argument is that the more people watch television news the more they are aware of the community events. Simply put, we live in a society that we should be always aware of everything ranging from weather issues to economic and political events. Take the exchange rate which is changing the circadian clock as an example. After every political decision or facing a crisis or even small countries delegate meeting, the rates are changed. So it is compulsory to keep up to date with daily events especially people who play a business role in the community and TV offers this to us.
In conclusion, considering the points discussed above, the most rational conclusion to be drawn is that television benefits in people's lives are inevitable. This is mainly because it is informative and educative most of the time.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12592592593 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86218426476 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618518518519 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6014340524 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.8571428571 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35714285714 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191316260609 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057596925421 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604528285438 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110115334171 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427081388307 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.