In recent years, a rich variety of music can be found around the global and it provides us a lot of enjoyments. It is questionable, nowadays, whether Traditional music is important or International Music. However, in the following essay, I will explain the necessity of music in our life and why traditional music is more valuable than International Music.
Admittedly, Music is an art, and we listen this to entertain ourselves. It helps us in various ways to make our moments comfortable. For example: when we feel boring or sad, we listen to music and it changes our feelings at once. Also when people stuck in a heavy traffic jam for a long time, by listening music we transmute our moment from boredom into enjoyable. Music is food of our soul. It is quite impossible to think any birthday party or wedding ceremony without music. Music is directly or indirectly connected throughout our life.
In terms of considering which kind of music is more valuable, International music should not be valued more over Traditional music. International music are widely popular it is true but, this music is mainly for commercial purpose. In contrast, Traditional music, such as folk song, represents the culture, customs and history of a country. It helps a person to connect with their ancestors, to their roots and most importantly, every traditional song contain a significant meaning of life which is really heart touching. And that is why, traditional music stays alive decades after decades and win everyone hearts always.
To sum up, it is clear that Music is an inseparable and essential part of our culture and our daily life, so life without music quite impossible. Furthermore, I believe that to preserve our past and custom we should give priority on traditional music more and more over International music.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ic and it changes our feelings at once. Also when people stuck in a heavy traffic ja...
^^^^
Line 5, column 617, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...s after decades and win everyone hearts always. To sum up, it is clear that Music ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, really, so, for example, in contrast, kind of, such as, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03300330033 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90775745655 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567656765677 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8853670704 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7058823529 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444295329605 0.244688304435 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180340372971 0.084324248473 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111506705382 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315038141716 0.151304729494 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591676586011 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.