These days many advertisements are aimed at children. What effect do you think they have? Should advertising to children be more controlled and regulated?
With the expansion of communication, we are influenced by the diversity of messages and images that seduce us through the most varied form of media. Among them is advertisement, which implicates us to appeal of sale with its strategic manoeuvres. Now, these days many advertisements are aimed at children, which according to me, have opposite effects which are as follow.
Although there are some favourable effects of advertising on children, the fact is that it can also have many negative effects on young minds, especially if parents are not careful and do not teach their children that money is important. These influence their minds, creating the need for them to buy the product they see. Advertisements encourage their children to persuade their parents to have the products, regardless they need them or not and whether they are useful or not. Many throw tantrums and use different tactics to force the adults to get them what they want. In addition to this, the commercial ads have put adversely affect on young children. Many business promotions of junk foods, unhealthy beverages have changed the eating habit of adolescent. These ads encourage unhealthy eating, which in turn has led to an increase in obesity, diabetes, heart problems and other severe disease in teenager.
Furthermore, many ad agencies use sexual content which pollute the thinking of growing children. They use beautiful young women to attract buyers. Form chocolate to clothing, every ad seen is sexual in nature. Children both young and teenagers have a negative prospective and this impact them in many ways. For example, young girls think that if they do not look or act sexy like woman in ad, they will not be accepted.
By citing the above mentioned downside, there is a need to be controlled. The government should make regulation or law to avert the gravity of the situation. Not only government but parents should come forward to monitor the behaviour of their children in context to ad.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
... to me, have opposite effects which are as follow. Although there are some favourable ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 634, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
..., the commercial ads have put adversely affect on young children. Many business promotion...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, so, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07012195122 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73346082386 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573170731707 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9990079248 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3888888889 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377087262596 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10128286436 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927360330378 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196130213722 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565271050899 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.