Today, it is vitally weighty for developing advances in health, education and commerce countries and the affluent countries should engage more responsibility in helping to the poor nations in such areas.
First of all, in terms of heath conditions, wealthy nations should support to the needy nations with free medicine. In fact, in the poor nations the mortality of infants has grown up, which results of various diseases by inheriting from maternal or paternal who have deficiency of health. For instance, one of the feasible ways of helping in this area, rich states should provide them with skilled physicians by directing them to the poor states.
Secondly, regarding education it would be great if affluent states could contribute education for free of charge for citizens of the destitute countries. In reality, there are numerous inhabitants who are lack of literacy which leads to deteriorate of country’s economy. The result of improvements in educational system the poor nations could enhance the economic system as well.
Finally, in the field of trade the rich states should loan some amount of currency to the poor states. In particular, owing to the deficiency of resources, some nations have broken system which leads to famine and poverty. As a result of aid of subsidies the poor nations could improve the commercial system which is helpful in country’s developments.
On the other hand, while receiving the assistances from the wealthy countries, nevertheless the poor countries’ authorities might rely on these aids and ignore their responsibility. Therefore, at some point the government of needy states should act effectively in order to stand on their feet by themselves.
Having investigated the arguments, it appears to me that it is crucially important that the richer countries in advances of health, literacy and commerce.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 197, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...reality, there are numerous inhabitants who are lack of literacy which leads to deterio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in fact, in particular, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33840304183 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00143816097 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570342205323 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.5944601211 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.8333333333 7.06120827912 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2526454836 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879327923615 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389232282573 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135073206627 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329187030742 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.