In today’s job market, it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Nowadays, pragmatic experience is becoming much more highly appreciated than academic knowledge in any fields of career. Notwithstanding, I disagree with the idea that the role of educational qualifications will be eliminated when applying for an occupation in years to come.
It cannot be denied that realistic ability is the major factor over the course of reaching achievements in any profession. Hands-on accomplishment make it easier for you to deal with the tasks and make progress. Nevertheless, it is the latter step which could only emerge after you got the job. In this case, an official degree would become the ticket allowing you to get through the door. Among a large number of candidates, the qualifications attached to their owner’s command and experience take responsibility as the filter which helps employers distinguish which one is the most eligible for
the post.
In addition, the experiences are initially constructed on the basis of theory. It is widespread belief that a significant variety of knowledge cannot be casted light on in the absence of education. Each occupation has its particular characteristics and features requiring profound study and research. The employees with academic diplomas are more or less educated and trained under professional materials and working methods which give them a solid foundation to apply in real environment.
For the reasons mentioned above, I take the view that beside the applied skills, a formal qualification also plays an essential role in the process of landing a job with the benefits it supplies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...wing you to get through the door. Among a large number of candidates, the qualifications attached...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 602, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...guish which one is the most eligible for the post. In addition, the experience...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, so, in addition, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40963855422 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18902308363 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.646586345382 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5229931205 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.25 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0897516795497 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.029956509748 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312175596632 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0523090961214 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239005730524 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.