In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that practical skills are considered more important than academic qualifications when it coms to getting a job. Some people suggest that job seekers may not need any formal qualifications in the future due to this trend. Neverthless, in my opinion, it is unlikely that academic qualifications will ever become necessary.
On the one hand, it cannot be denied that the business market is hungry for skilled employees because pratical skills have a vital roles in success of a company. They can bring their experience and other benifits to companies if they have good practical s...
Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'role'?
Suggestion: role
...es because pratical skills have a vital roles in success of a company. They can bring...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...nies if they have good practical skills.In contrast, people who have only studied ...
^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...tical skills and theoretical knowledge. Thats really necessary for getting a good job...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, really, so, still, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24513618677 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87099948475 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599221789883 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4733926417 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2857142857 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19093289393 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679822015018 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721111621044 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136843129026 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663655348513 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.