In the modern societies, we truly priority the effects of advanced sciences and technologies. Whereas, artists such as musicians, painters and writers are still appreciated because of thier profound value, in particularly cutural and spiritual impacts.
To begin with, withoud doubt to say that art has a mission to nurture human mental health. When sciences and technologies facilitate our physical life by digital equipments and artificial intelligience applications, work of art like visual arts, performances and music coveys lots of precious meanings in life. Therefore, they help us release stress after working, including reducing the risk of depression -according to many recent studies.
Work of artists is a consequence of multiple side of view when modern findings are results of one side of view on the other hand. For instance, let pretend we are anjoying a masterpiece of abtract art. Whether the process is simple by our dicrect vision or it needs far more intensive anylizations. Following this, art makes us more creative, open-minded and to have a comprehension about a particular problem.
The last but not least, art certaintly breaks the barrier of cutural limitation among countries. In the state of these days, we tend to flexibly interact with a diversity of heritage worldwide. As a result, we have opportunity to contact and understand each other in a deeper way. Art brings individuals together by their own beauty and then these connections would like to stand in the test of time because of reserving these work.
In brief, artists and their work play a fundamental role consisting of nourishing people's inner soul, creating humanity and maintaining unity across the world. These are core elements of building human civilization those sciences and technologies are unable to solve well. Utimately, the development of new-cutting edges has to go hand in hand with art progress.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, then, therefore, well, whereas, as to, for instance, in brief, in particular, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3102310231 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99653973781 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650165016502 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9592258442 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5625 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23587370184 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612699320769 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484751810988 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11797095098 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496351060995 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.