In today’s world, it’s private companies rather than government to pay for and carry out most on scientific research. Do you think the advantages outweight the disadvantages?
In our modern-day society, it is considered that the number of private companies participating in scientific research is increasing rapidly. The question of whether this trend can bring benefits or not still remains controversial. Personally, I am firmly of the former opinion because of the following reasons.
To begin with, it is believed that the government can allocate budgets to many other areas of public spending. The priority of expenditures spent on national infrastructure such as traffic system or educational and heath-care facilities can lead to the development in quality of citizens’ life. For instance, the decrease of overburden in many hospitals can improve the treatment process, resulting in the higher survival rate in severe patients.
More importantly, the diversity of research done by the private sector is believed to be a significant support to the government. Since the human and financial resources of the government are still limited, the wide range of scientific investigations of private companies can contribute to the early discoveries of new conclusions leading to the improvements in many fields of life.
Some opponents of the above idea may distrust the accuracy of research conducted by private sector. For example, a research about a nutrition facts of fried potato carried out by a processed food manufacturer may provide an untrustworthy point of view. This can be true to some extent. However, the censorship of government before the publication of information can solve this issue.
In conclusion, the participation of private companies in scientific research can have positive effects on the government as well as the whole nation. The more responsibly the private sector contributes, the faster the nation will develop.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...entific research is increasing rapidly. The question of whether this trend can bring benefits or not st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nion because of the following reasons. To begin with, it is believed that the g...
^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g. The priority of expenditures spent on national infrastructure such as traffic ...
^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ens’ life. For instance, the decrease of overburden in many hospitals can improve...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gher survival rate in severe patients. More importantly, the diversity of resea...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e improvements in many fields of life. Some opponents of the above idea may dis...
^^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...nducted by private sector. For example, a research about a nutrition facts of fried potato...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n of information can solve this issue. In conclusion, the participation of priv...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51094890511 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22494770631 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583941605839 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5743964322 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.857142857 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178241100953 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586880394653 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554178909405 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10308296347 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407641300086 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.