TOPIC: It is inevitable that as technology advances, traditional cultures will be lost. It seems that we cannot have these two things together. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
It is generally acknowledged that the immense technological progress is one of the major factors which gradually turn the world into a cross-cultural place. People hold the fear that their national conventional custom will be vanished due to it. I totally disagree with this idea.
Unquestionably, tradition of a country was established from the phase of its birth, which gathering the cream of various eras, ages and empires. Even up until this present moment, it is being constructed on a daily basis. Along the flow of history, the perpetuation of customary values has been proved in a significant number of nations. For instance, Vietnam was dominated by China for even a thousand years not only in territory but also in spiritual lives. Notwithstanding, they resolutely maintain their own precious time-honored custom in absence of emerging. Therefore, there is little chance that the invention of technology pose a fatal threat on the role of original culture.
It cannot be denied that thanks to the social network, people, especially the youngsters, all around the world tends to become international citizens. They speak in a common language and share a remarkable amount of knowledge and experience about their native lands. As a consequence, surges of trends are easily spreading regardless of countries’ borders. However, cultural import is only adopted once it meets the demand of motherland’s lifestyle and devotes to the development of a nation, which requires the extremely careful consideration. In short, the loss of conventional beauty is not able to occur in all likelihood.
For these reason above, it is my firm conviction that technological advances could solely convert the appearance of a country, not its core value which is built on classes of predecessors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 638, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is not able to occur in all likelihood. For these reason above, it is my firm co...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h is built on classes of predecessors.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3661971831 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23859450169 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665492957746 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1547756106 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0867082389928 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0229399700725 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0238018737864 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0510210049809 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168541485372 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.