Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The capacity of the universities to accept students should be divided between males and females accurately. I strongly disagree
Because of the difference in the population of males and females, the number of participants would be varied. For instance, the population of girls in Ukraine is much bigger than boys and it would be injustice to consider the same capacity for girls for university’s positions.
Secondly, male students have higher propensity for some specific majors which is totally different from female’s tendencies. In this regard, boys would unlikely get interested in some positions which are designated to them, beside they would hardly compete for limited opportunities they have in some other majors. For example, mining engineering has generally higher demand among males than females and usually the number of girls in the class is not comparable with boys.
Therefore, this suggestion could deviate societies from their goals. The first priority of each society should be the development or moving forward to developing. For achieving this goal, the universities should bring somebody up who are capable to lead the society to the more developed status. They should pick more potential students regardless their gender. The universities’ duty is just accommodating the fair situation for students to compete.
In conclusion, there are many reasons why this suggestion is not endorsed. It would engender injustice among adolescents who are trying to continue their education and pursue their career goals and even retard the process of development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... females accurately. I strongly disagree There are some rational reasons which em...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36434108527 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77911031075 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546511627907 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9302669577 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1885057374 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714731738368 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730854580962 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128213091911 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10711355378 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.